Hump day links

Mar 26
2008
Filed in: Links, Chicago Criterium, Downers Grove


Comments (9)
  • » Ron Cook (Project 5 Racing) dug up some Sun-Times coverage from the 1987 Citi-Circuit, a weekend of criteriums in Downers Grove, Evanston and downtown Chicago.  Total purse for the weekend was $75,000, which back then was quite a bit of scratch. Downers Grove was on the same course we know today, and Evanston was similar to last year’s Evanston Grand Prix. The Chicago course was located near the spot of this year’s Chicago Criterium, but instead of ducking down to Michigan Avenue it included two 180-degree turns on Columbus, not unlike the Tour of Elk Grove course. Note also the snarky lede from reporter Kevin Williams, now a track sprinter for Alberto’s: “Memo to racers: Don’t fall asleep out there, as these aren’t the most exciting courses in the world.” This from a man who has spent most of his cycling life turning left.

  • » There’s no sound more beautiful than an exciting race being called in Italian. “Un attacco! Un attacco! Vittoria storica! Eroica!”

  • » Run a red -- allegedly -- go to jail. Welcome to the new Chicago. Elsewhere, the Lake County Sheriff’s Department recently had a word with the Judson Ride after it rolled through a stop sign on Everett, and this week the Glencoe police stopped a Met Cycling rider for going through a red light, with “no traffic and sleet falling from the sky at about 6:15 a.m.”

  • » Coincidentally, a new study finds that 96 percent of Chicago drivers exceed the speed limit by 5 mph or more. CBF notes that when cars strike pedestrians at 40 mph, the victims stand a 20 percent chance of survival.

  • » Psyche yourself up for Hillsboro with this trailer for an upcoming Paris-Roubaix documentary. ("Every day when I wake up, I see myself winning it.” Poor George. I know the feeling.)

  • » The popular Turin ride resumes tonight at 5:30. It doesn’t move to 6 until Memorial Day, and lights are recommended during March.

Comments

1.

Mar 26
2008

7:52 am

Matt S. (vitaminwater-Trek)

I don’t see where anyone went to jail, Luke.  If you run a red light, you should get a ticket.  Note that I said ‘if’. 

How can we demand motorists respect us if we don’t respect the rules everyone has to live with?  If we as cyclists aren’t willing to police ourselves, shouldn’t the police do it for us?

And it’s not just the messengers and alleycats...I’ve seen the turin and judson rides do some pretty stupid and reckless things.  You can yell and scream at the pack and it’s about as effective as screaming at a bunch of grazing cows.

And really, is anyone surprised?  They announced the “summer crackdown [on cyclists]” in the paper. Congratulations:  the “bike program coordinator for the Department of Transportation” is not on our side anymore.

We have no one to blame but ourselves.

2.

Mar 26
2008

8:09 am

Luke Seemann's avatar

Luke Seemann (XXX Racing-AthletiCo)

No, nobody went to jail. That’s hyberbole on my part.

I’m tired of the “How can we demand respect?” canard. I don’t care if motorists respect us. I just want them to stop killing us. And honestly: Do you honestly think that our failure to follow the law to the letter is all that’s preventing motorists from respecting us? Ha!

How many pedestrians and cyclists are killed in Chicago each year by speeding and otherwise negligent drivers? Dozens.

How many pedestrians, drivers or other bystanders are killed in Chicago each year by cyclists who do not come to a complete stop at stop signs? (I’ll wait while you consult your records.)

It’s all a matter of proportion. I have no problem with cyclists who go through red lights or stop signs if they do so carefully and with consideration for traffic—I do not consider that “stupid and reckless,” and neither should you.

Similarly, if cars weighed 20 pounds, were only 20 inches wide and maxed out at 20 mph, I would have no problem if they rolled through them, too. (Oh, wait ... Cars already roll through intersections. Spend an hour at any stop sign in this city and tell me how many of the next 100 cars come to a complete stop behind the white line. I’ll give you $100 if it’s more than five. And yet, do you suppose there’s handwringing on the car forums? “If only we stopped at stop signs, then cyclists would respect us!")

I don’t know if this is a “crackdown,” but we’ve had them before. Group rides have been stopped before, and messengers have been harassed for years. If this is a crackdown, I expect it will eventually subside just like all the others.

3.

Mar 26
2008

9:03 am

Julian (vitaminwater-Trek)

Um… the law is in fact the law and it requires all traffic (cyclists included) to obey the rules of the road without exception.  I’m a supporter of Utah’s law allowing cyclists to treat lights as stop signs and stop signs as yields when traffic is light but the fact remains that ISN’T the law in Chicago. 

Now, as someone who’s been hit by several cars I’m not defending idiot motorists but I think that a HUGE owness lies on the part of cyclists.  We know that cars weigh 2 tonnes and that we have little to no protection save a foam helmet and yet too often WE do stupid things that endanger not only ourselves but the other cyclists, pedestrians and yes, motorists around us.

I too don’t give a rat’s ass if motorists respect me.  But until there’s a sea change in the perception of cyclists by motorists I’M going to do everything I can do to protect my own ass- that includes obeying the law and not being a dumb ass and sprinting down Green Bay, whipping through six-way intersections, or riding recklessly.  I’ve been part of group rides that roll through intersections, hog lanes, and otherwise behave recklessly and thank goodness nothing has come of it… but when the XXX ride blows through a stop sign, or the Judson ride launches a harrowing sprint down Sheridan, or when the Harper ride occupies the whole road on blind descents is it our place to point the finger at motorists, many of whom are probably terrified and confused about what to do about the 40 cyclists all over the road…

I can’t control the behavior of motorists and it’s not my place to do so.  We can get into a massive debate about the behavior of motorists and who’s right, or the proportion of incidents caused by various parties but that’s foolish and a waste of time.

The bottom line is that nobody is going to protect you except yourself… Let’s all start there and stop crying and worrying about what driver’s do and own OUR behavior.

Sheesh.

4.

Mar 26
2008

9:20 am

Peter Allen's avatar

Peter Allen (XXX Racing/Athletico)

I’ve been more conscious lately to at least put a foot down at a red light, look both ways then go (though, I guess that’s still technically illegal in IL).  I’ve done this in front of a few cops the past few weeks.  The cops I know said it’s more cyclists completely ignoring a stop that POs them.  I’ll be curious if the average “cyclist” in Lakeview riding their Rockhopper on their way back from a softball game going the wrong way down Roscoe and not stopping at stop signs will ever get pulled over.  I doubt it unless they’re dressed like a messenger.

BTW, I’ve been mistaken for a bike cop when wearing my lime green rain jacket and flagged down by a motorist to complain about a parking ticket and another pedestrian to report a motorist running a red light.  It actually took a sentence or two to convince them I was not a cop (but, I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express).

5.

Mar 26
2008

10:01 am

Matt S. (vitaminwater-Trek)

Luke:

Likewise, I’m tired of the fallacy that motorists’ disregard of the law somehow empowers cyclists to do the same.  I learned back in kindergarden that ‘two wrongs don’t make a right.”

And, as you pointed out, one should thoughtfully consider the proportionality of the situtation:  in a car vs. bike scenario, the car (or “cage” or “coffin” for you counter-culturists) will always win.  As you pointed out, cars speed and roll through red lights.  So we as cyclists should protest by...running red lights in some suicidal ritual of civil disobedience?

I agree with you that us stopping at red lights isn’t going to made motorists respect us.  It was a Pollyanna moment on my part, I admit.  Let me phrase it a different way--when we blatently run red lights in front of motorists, it reinforces their expectations of us and, in the worst case, justifies their “messing with us” or “teaching us a lesson”.  If you’ve ridden a bike long enough, as you well know, Luke, a motorist will take it upon himself to ‘teach you a lesson.” I’ve lost count, myself.

As for your strawman asking basically ‘how many people die because of cyclists running red lights’, well, I don’t know, but it’s at least one per year. Are you OK with it now?

I have personally witnessed a pedestrian enter a crosswalk (with the signal), only to be ‘saved’ by another pedestrian who did see the alleycat flying down the street.  These jackasses were doing 20+ mph on a busy city street and would have broken many bones in this person’s body, if not killed them.

Now let me back up.  I appreciate that there is a vast difference between slowing/stopping at a light and rolling through after checking for traffic, and blowing through a red light, putting our “red light negotiating skills” to the test.  I get that.  I suspect you and I aren’t even debating the same scenario.

Let me also state that if you have ridden with me, you know that I am the last person in the world a motorist wants to mess with.  I react disproportionately at any threat to my health when I’m on a bike.  I don’t want anyone thinking that I’m advocating that we as cyclists give up our rights and let motorists bully us.  I just don’t consider running red lights one of my rights.

6.

Mar 26
2008

11:28 am

Luke Seemann's avatar

Luke Seemann (XXX Racing-AthletiCo)

I think we’re all in more agreement than it might appear. I, too, am more than happy to come to a complete stop in the presence of traffic, if only to be a counter-example. It’s a matter of defining our terms and recognizing the difference between the recklessness of alleycats and the technically-illegal-but-benign rolling of lights that we ALL are guilty of.

My point in juxtaposing the two items is to question the way law enforcement is devoting its resources. If police are genuinely interested in public safety, what is the best course of action: Going after cyclists at 6 in the morning, or ticketing the drivers who are barreling down our streets above the speed limit? Which scofflaw poses the true threat? My God, with 96 percent of drivers breaking the law, police could make our streets safe AND cure the city’s budget crisis.

7.

Mar 26
2008

11:33 am

Matt S. (vitaminwater-Trek)

Please don’t get me started on our budget crisis).  I’ll have go back on my medication :(

8.

Mar 26
2008

11:34 am

Luke Seemann's avatar

Luke Seemann (XXX Racing-AthletiCo)

And to one of Julian’s good points, I too am terrified and embarrassed by many of our sprints on the North Shore. They’re alleycats in themselves. Moving forward I’ve personally pledged to not take part in any. They’re great practice, sure, but not worth the risk.

9.

Mar 26
2008

1:12 pm

yobdlog (xXx Racing-AthletiCo)

Well I didn’t go to jail but here is my 2 cents on the experience overall (now day 2 after my ‘incident’).

We’re dealing with people.  I was out of breath and made a comment about ‘where I was going’ and I believe in the huff and puff of my labored breathing, the 60+ year old officer took my comment as offensive and took the authoratative stance on me with Chicago greased wheel quickness.  I noticed his attitude changed from ‘you broke the law and I’m going to remind you why’ to ‘oh, so you wanna play tough guy ehh? well i got your tough guy sandwich’.  Who knows what the outcome would’ve been if we were both jovial from the start......

I also think that because the amount of distraction that it caused for passerbys in cars, the fact he stopped me in front of a crowded restaurant, added to the extra tenseness to compel the officers to make the write-up seem warranted.  The drivers who rolled down the windows and yelled ‘Bogus!’ in my support, may have made my situation worse in that the officers felt they ‘really’ needed to show me and the public who is in charge.

My biggest gripe about this whole thing is that there is discretion on the police’s part to evaluate what particularly needs enforcement - its not written in ANY of our laws that an officer of the law cannot NOT enforce the law - its subject to their evaluation.  Otherwise, if there were cops giving tickets for every single f’ing offense on the road or otherwise, we’d be inundated in an adminstrative beauracratic nightmare of sorts (moreso than we already are in the City).

That copper made a choice, evaluated his options and consciously said, well, I’m gonna get him.  To what service did he give the community by doing so.  Is the lesson worth the outcome in administrative costs to the city?  Police are here to serve and protect - so explain to me who did they serve and who did they protect in this instance?

Whatever - I am dealing with Chicago’s finest and shouldn’t have expected anything else.

 

You must be logged in to comment.
If you have commented here before, you may already have an account. Go to this page to check. If you're new, take a moment to register.



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

sponsored by

[ Cycle Analyze ]
 

REcent comments

  • Tour of Oak Brook preview
    T-Rex: Thanks, Jim. I appreciate the effort and the information. Thanks for organizing ...
  • Tour of Oak Brook preview
    Jim H.: In response to T-Rex, we VERY much wanted follow cars and even had a line into u...
  • Thanks!
    Tim Keeley: Hey, is that Ted Burger (Flatlandia)almost getting clipped by the Mercedes, whic...
  • Tour of Oak Brook preview
    T-Rex: I have gotten a wheel from a following vehicle in a RR and caught back on before...
 
sponsored by

 
 [ Tour of Oak Brook ] 
AUG. 23, 2008